<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Readers&#039; Thoreau | Michelle Switzer | Activity</title>
	<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/members/michelleswitzer/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/members/michelleswitzer/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Michelle Switzer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 17:11:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da833fb0d24c0fc63d7b5c5ef6facaa1</guid>
				<title>Michelle Switzer commented on the post, Solitude, on the site Walden</title>
				<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/walden/solitude/#comment-1433</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:12:31 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad that Thoreau got rid of the extra part that was in Version A. I think that his comparisons are good enough without having to go one step further, closer to the edge that readers wouldn&#8217;t want to continue [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">48c0b3849f8497094336000748b50e9d</guid>
				<title>Michelle Switzer commented on the post, Solitude, on the site Walden</title>
				<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/walden/solitude/#comment-1432</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:08:55 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also find it interesting that he would write such things about his neighbors and visitors in the chapter titled &#8220;solitude&#8221;. Thoreau probably understood that solitude was for him, and the visitors and neighbors [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6b948d95cd6433c2ccc1c00f5c071c6</guid>
				<title>Michelle Switzer commented on the post, Conclusion 1-9, on the site Walden</title>
				<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/walden/conclusion/conclusion-1-9/#comment-1430</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:59:43 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question, I don&#8217;t think Thoreau knew he wanted to write a conclusion until he had edited it. I think, with a writer with such thoughts as his, he never was fully completed, or satisfied with his [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b2ffaa4da89d134b6740bc5cc491e842</guid>
				<title>Michelle Switzer commented on the post, Spring 1-13, on the site Walden</title>
				<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/walden/spring/spring-1-13/#comment-1429</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:45:44 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing that with us! I definitely had no idea that these paragraphs were added into the original text. These do add to the text as a whole as he is explaining, in full detail, the newness of spring. [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3020f5719f13864fbb94770034c03cd5</guid>
				<title>Michelle Switzer became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/activity/p/1870/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:54:16 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>