Walden

[? Be rather the Mungo Park, the Lewis and Clark and Frobisher, of your own streams and oceans; explore your own higher latitudes,—]

This is a similar sentiment to Thoreau’s remarks in Where I Lived, And What I Lived For about the railroads. In WILAWILF, Thoreau resists the invention of the railroad, rather proposing that if everyone boycotts the train, then it will no longer run. I think at the center of this argument is really Thoreau trying to emphasize the power of the individual to forge his own path, which is the central message of this paragraph in Conclusion.

Thoreau’s whole thing about “beaten tracks” in Conclusion reminds me of what he says earlier in “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For.” Back there, he talks about how people fall into routines without thinking and end up living those “quiet desperation” lives. Here, he uses the literal path he wore in the woods as a symbol for the mental habits we slip into. It’s like he’s circling back to the same idea but showing it in a new way, not just society pushing us into ruts, but us doing it to ourselves. And when he says he wants to “go before the mast,” it connects to his earlier push to live deliberately and see the world clearly instead of hiding below deck. It is the same message, just with a fresh angle.

In this paragraph, Thoreau’s imagery of migration and movement echoes his earlier voice in “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For,” when he emphasizes the importance of breaking free from our routines that can limit human potential. I think that his earlier chapters focus more on physically removing yourself from society to live more intentionally. Thoreau expands that same idea by suggesting that the real limitation isn’t necessarily physical, but mental. By comparing migrating animals to humans who feel stuck in social roles (like a town clerk), Thoreau slightly shifts his earlier argument, suggesting that the ways we limit ourselves can be more restrictive than any physical boundaries. This helps him strengthen his main idea that real freedom isn’t just about changing your surroundings, it is about changing the ways you think about all the possibilities.

[ Leave a comment on paragraph 4 30 I left the woods for as good a reason as I went there. Perhaps it seemed to me that I had several more lives to live, and could not spare any more time for that one. It is remarkable how easily and insensibly we fall into a particular route, and make a beaten track for ourselves]

Henry David Thoreau explains here that he left the woods and returned to normal life for a similar reason as why he went there. He felt as though his time at Walden Pond had come to an end and that it would have been a disservice to himself and humanity to not embark on a new chapter. This reminds me of language he ahs used throughout the whole book and especially in the beginning in Where I lived and What I lived for as he is explaining why he went to the woods in the first place. The similar language Thoreau has used throughout the whole book and especially in the ending emphasizes his wish to live life deliberately and focus on the true meaning of life without all the distractions of modern society.  By him saying he left Walden pond because he knew it was time to start a new chapter of life and discovery, he is living the philosophy that he preaches which is one of experience and true meaning.

Some of the language and mention of animals in this first paragraph of the conclusion remind me of Thoreau’s discussion and observation of animals in the chapters Former Inhabitants and Winter Visitors, along with Winter Animals. In the Winter Animals chapter, for example, Thoreau often talks about the beauty of simply observing the animals around you, and he was incredibly patient in doing so. The animals discussed in these chapters consisted of local wildlife that Thoreau saw on most days. However, in this chapter he broadens the wildlife he discusses, mentioning bison in Colorado, and even giraffes in Africa later in the chapter. This is helping to express his message that anyone, anywhere, can choose to do what he did. Broaden their views of the world by looking inside themselves and appreciating the small things of life, such as nature, rather than chasing a materialistic life. Along with this, a difference within this chapter is that when referring to various animals, Thoreau does not include their scentific name in italics as he did in previous chapters. Perhaps this is because he is not observing these animals specifically, or that he simply did not want that in the final chapter.

The language used in this last sentence, specifically when he discusses “Only that day dawns to which we are awake,” “There is more day to dawn. The sun is but a morning star,” is very familiar to that of earlier sections like “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For.” In that previous section, he urges people to live deliberately and awake and to make the most of every moment. This is discussing the same thing, as it is saying that awakening is not a one-time act but an ongoing process of renewal. I love that his last paragraph connects to other parts of the book because it makes it feel full circle.

[I called on the king, but he made me wait in his hall, and conducted like a man incapacitated for hospitality. There was a man in my neighborhood who lived in a hollow tree. His manners were truly regal. I should have done better had I called on him.]

This line is incredibly reminiscent of a scene noted earlier in Walden,  in House-Warming 7. There, the line was…

[A house whose inside is as open and manifest as a bird’s nest, and you cannot go in at the front door and out at the back without seeing some of its inhabitants; where to be a guest is to be presented with the freedom of the house, and not to be carefully excluded from seven eighths of it, shut up in a particular cell, and told to make yourself at home there,—in solitary confinement. Nowadays the host does not admit you to his hearth, but has got the mason to build one for yourself somewhere in his alley, and hospitality is the art of keeping you at the greatest distance].

In both lines, the point Thoreau is trying to make is very much the same. In seems that today’s society is flawed. We are focused on wealth and progress as the most important thing, rather than morality or connection. In both cases, someone is pictured as being welcomed into a mansion, but ignored. In this section, Thoreau points out that a man who lived in a hollow tree has more manners. He has less, so his values are better.

In this paragraph, Thoreau reiterates what he said earlier in “Where I Lived, and What I Lived For” about living deliberately.  In both chapters, he’s pushing the idea that people should stop just going through the motions and actually choose how they want to live. But here in the “Conclusion,” it feels more directed at the reader, like he’s trying to motivate us instead of just reflecting on his own experience. It kind of turns his earlier ideas into a challenge, making it feel more personal and motivating toward readers.

@toriwebster: What blows my mind about this passage is the number of superficially disparate things Thoreau sees as deeply connected: not only leaves, trees, blood vessels, rivers, internal organs (lungs, liver), and anatomical appendages (nose, lips, ear lobes) but the words themselves used to describe some of these phenomena (such as the one you mention, lobe), the etymological roots of these words, and even the shapes of the letters in these words (the “single lobed” lower-case b vs. the “double lobed upper-case B). Ideas of connection and unity seem to lie at the heart of this whole extended passage: “The Maker of this earth but patented a leaf,” Thoreau writes in the next paragraph.

If you look at the fluid-text edition of Walden, you’ll see that Thoreau is working with the word “lobe” from the first appearance of this passage in the manuscript. The fluid-text edition, following Clapper, notes that this particular portion of paragraph 7 first enters the manuscript in Version E (late 1852–1853), but as William Rossi’s essay on the Digital Thoreau website, “Making Walden and its Sandbank” explains, the revision history of the entire “sand foliage” passage is more complicated that Clapper’s timeline suggests, with some leaves of HM 924 (which also use the word “lobe”) having originally belonged to a now-fragmentary manuscript Jouurnal that Thoreau filled from winter 1846–47 through spring 1848.

In short, the revision history of the entire sand foliage passage is, appropriately, at least as complicated as the ideas expressed in it.

I admire Thoreau’s return to his initial critiques on societal haste and the speed in with which society seems to be advancing. He specifically make the analogy of a man hearing a different drummer, and that it is unimportant that as people, we mature at the same pace as others, as an apple-tree or an oak. I found similar language in this paragraph and language Thoreau utilized in the beginning of his novel. Describing people in, ‘such a desperate haste to succeed’, with this description I think Thoreau also allows the reader to ponder ideas he has presented about what ‘success’ means to the individual. For Thoreau his experiment at Walden has not been described as a success or a failure, but rather an experiment, but one that fulfilled and taught him things he did not previously know. I think this paragraph and the diction Thoreau utilizes is a perfect example of the ways in which he connects almost all aspect’s of his novel: nature, humanity, experience, the concept of success, and purpose. He does this seamlessly and uses language that open up the conclusion of his book, pushing people to look within themselves to determine what they value, what to everyone reading, makes life meaningful.