Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
I appreciate your reflection, Addana, and I think your analysis here is on point. I’m curious: why do you think you “shy away from” experience as a “valuable teacher”? I ask in part because I find I do the same thing. Do you think there’s something about our education system that leads to that? I’m also recalling Thoreau’s own educational experiment — the school he started with his brother — and how he emphasized experiential education and thought his students would learn better in the fields and woods than in the classroom.
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
I agree. The quote does capture Thoreau’s desire to strip life down to its core and “start from scratch.” This goes back to his anecdote about not buying the farm. He doesn’t need material possessions to feel fulfilled. He just needs the view of the landscape or time alone in the woods and he will be a rich man.
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
I thought the same too! After reading your comment, I analyzed both paragraphs again and I realized that paragraph 19 actually strengthens paragraph 15. In paragraph 15, he encourages people to shape their own lives with intention. In paragraph 19, he criticizes news and the post office because he sees them as distractions that pull people away from that deeper way of living. This highlights his belief that too much focus on outside noise can take away our ability to experience life fully.
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
I love how you highlight Thoreau’s emphasis on time as something precious and fleeting “critical hour” feels like a wake-up call to really think about our days more carefully. It’s almost as though Thoreau is challenging us to see even the smallest choices we make as significant pieces of a larger, more meaningful picture. Your reflection on how you’ve used your time so far reminds me that I often neglect those little details, moments that, when added up, might reveal if I’m truly living in a way that aligns with my aspirations. Time is such an interesting concept and deserves to be talked about.
[whippoorwill]
In the book I mentioned earlier, My Side of the Mountain, the main character spends his first few days in the woods, waking up to the loud call of the whippoorwill instead of the usual city traffic. His only neighbors are the Baron weasel, and like Thoreau, he spends his days foraging and observing the wildlife around him. I believe he would deeply appreciate and resonate with Harivansa’s quote: “An abode without birds is like meat without seasoning.”
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
Hi Catie!
I find your comment very though provoking. Before reading Thoreau, I had misconceptions that he was a man that stayed in his cabin in the woods, only observing nature around him, supporting pacifism and peace. While, Thoreau does tend to write often about the benefits of having respect for the people and places around us, he is radical in his social ideals. Not only did Thoreau write to promote peace, he was an active abolitionist and wrote about the social justice issues of his time. Thoreau’s minimalistic mindset led him to demote the social hierarchies abroad that were causing lower classes more pain. I find Thoreau a contradiction to the man I had in my mind as he calls out the bourgeoise. In some ways I think this makes Thoreau deeply revolutionary in his thinking.
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
Hi Grace,
I hadn’t really considered how Thoreau’s view of God might shape his ideas in Walden until now. It’s fascinating to think about how his perspective on the divine connects to his deep emphasis on the present moment. This small moment is so powerful for those who share the same beliefs, but I think what is even more compelling is that the message holds true even for those who don’t share the same beliefs. Spiritual experiences can come in any form but all start by fulling embracing the present moment. I think you are exactly right that it serves as a reminder to focus on the present, because this part of the text really did make me stop and reflect on all of the different aspects that go into being able to live in the moment.
[both air and water being perfectly still, but the sky overcast, mid-afternoon had all the serenity of evening, and the wood-thrush sang around, and was heard from shore to shore. A lake like this is never smoother than at such a time; and the clear portion of the air above it being shallow and darkened by clouds, the water, full of light and reflections, becomes a lower heaven itself so much the more important.]
I resonate with Thoreau’s physical descriptions of the place that he resides. It is affirming me as the reader the Thoreau practices what he writes about in Walden in noticing the little moments and highlighting the beauty of the natural world. The description that Thoreau includes throughout ‘Where I Lived, and What I Lived For” also provides a refreshing transition for the reader as Thoreau expresses a lot of his own opinions throughout the text. This passage struck me as a moment of calm and “perfectly still” just as Thoreau writes within the a text so full as Walden.
When I was reading this passage, this sentence stood out to me because Thoreau claimed that his cabin was fit for the gods, which is quite a bold statement! I completely agree with you—it seems that he was extremely proud of his cabin, and rightfully so. After all, it was something he created with his own hands! I also love how he feels it’s worthy of a divine being.
Posted in: ENGL 340 S25 Geneseo
I agree with you here, however I do wish to add a little to your comment. I believe that in this instance Thoreau is not necessarily saying that working for ones self is greater than working for another, or employing someone to work for you. Rather, he meant that one should enjoy their work in the moment, appreciate the world around them, and not dwell on retirement funds. to live deliberately is to live in the moment.
Register to join a group and leave comments.
Source: https://commons.digitalthoreau.org/walden/comments/tags/question/
Where I Lived, And What I Lived For 13-23 (2 comments)
[We must learn to reawaken and keep ourselves awake, not by mechanical aids, but by an infinite expectation of the dawn, which does not forsake us in our soundest sleep.]
Here, Thoreau talks about his desire to live a more natural and spiritualistic way of life. To him, advancing oneself morally is more important than advancing technologically. I wonder what he would think of the scenarios given in Gleick’s The Information, in which people interweave technology into their daily lives to make things simpler (such as inventing the telegraph for easier and faster communication). For example, I wonder what he would think of social media today. It has been argued for a long time that social media can be detrimental to an individual’s mental health, although, I believe that when used consciously and purposefully, it can lead to this moral growth that Thoreau describes.
“We must learn to reawaken and keep ourselves awake, not by mechanical aids, but by an infinite expectation of the dawn, which does not forsake us in our soundest sleep.”
This quote comes off in a very positive light, and is something that I believe a lot of people even to this day try to live by, yet it feels weakened by Thoreau’s decisions moving forward with his writing. Just four paragraphs later after setting up this sort of hope for a very beautiful way of treating life, he speaks out against news and the post office in general! Paragraph 19 seems to come from an entirely different viewpoint, which does not show this same appreciation, and that is very interesting to me! Does the negativity that most journalism carries actively contrast strongly enough with his positive views that it threatens their validity?
The Village (1 comment)
“It is true, I might have resisted forcibly with more or less effect, might have run ‘amok’ against society; but I preferred that society should run ‘amok’ against me, it being the desperate party”
How is society a “desperate party”? In the last few sections, Thoreau uses the word “desperate” to describe the reckless nature of some men and their society. “Desperate” is rather vague, but some synonyms I find especially applicable to Thoreau’s meaning of the word are “hasty”, “rash”, “desirous”, and “demoralized.” Thoreau’s fellow man seemed to lack the deliberation with which he led his life; instead, their lives are governed by rash decisions based on wayward desires, grounded in no certain morality. The list of synonyms marches on to include “lawless”, “violent”, and “resigned.” Thoreau knew the weight of the word he was using, and that weight has only increased over the years. With concern, Thoreau indicates how society seems ever more resigned to desperation rather than deliberation.
In the quote above, Thoreau re-iterates his civil disobedience. Rather than ‘running amok’ against society by evading the law, he calmly accepts his charge and does time in jail. He allows society, that desperate party, to run amok against him. I take this to mean he threw himself with some faith into that jail cell, figuring all the while that ‘society’ would do its utmost to keep him there. It seems he accepted this as a possibility, but kept faith that his fate would never be decided by desperate men and their “dirty institutions.” He was right, but the same cannot be said for many people in America today. Unfortunately, a country led by desperate men sows desperation among its citizens. “Dirty institutions” regularly decide the fate of our country, and by extension, the fate of our people, disparaging some and wildly benefitting others. How much longer can we trust society to “run amok” against us, fairly? How long before our best option may be to run amok against society ourselves?
Economy 82-97 (1 comment)
[The reader will perceive that I am treating the subject rather from an economic than a dietetic point of view, and he will not venture to put my abstemiousness to the test unless he has a well-stocked larder.]
We see disclaimers everywhere now, ranging anywhere from adult content warnings to seizure warnings. The tone of them is always serious, informative, and short. They are there for a reason–whether people think they are necessary or not. Because of the purpose of them, I see them as either being concerning for what the show is going to explore, or I groan because I want the show to start. However, when I read this sentence, I couldn’t help but laugh. It has the content of a disclaimer but the approach of a comedic skit. And so, I wonder what the purpose of this sentence actually was for Thoreau. Was he simply making fun of people who try everything they read without considering the consequences or the validity of the writer? Was he genuinely trying to warn people in a fun way not to do what he does with food because it could be harmful to them? Were people suing each other a lot back then too? Was Thoreau just protecting himself?